Difference between revisions of "Inner-city community energy in London"

From Urban Arena Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 104: Line 104:
|  
|  
|}
|}
== c) Actor constellations ==
'''10. Who initiated the intervention?'''
answer
'''11. Who are the envisioned benefiters of the intervention? (both at a local level and higher, if applicable)'''
answer
'''12. Who else is (going to be) involved in the intervention, and what was/is their main role?'''
{| class="wikitable"
|- style="font-weight:bold; text-align:center;"
! Actor types<ref>Actor types according to TRANSIT’s Critical Turning Point Database, http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/about-ctps-in-tsi-processes.</ref>
! Yes
! Actor name and role<ref>If easily possible mention sources for your association of roles.</ref>
|-
| Academic organizations
|
|
|-
| Religious organizations
|
|
|-
| Civil society organizations
|
|
|-
| Hybrid/ 3rd sector organizations
|
|
|-
| Platforms
|
|
|-
| NGOs
|
|
|-
| Social movements
|
|
|-
| Political parties
|
|
|-
| Media
|
|
|-
| Unions
|
|
|-
| Social entreprises
|
|
|-
| For profit entreprises
|
|
|-
| Local/regional government
|
|
|-
| Regional organizations
|
|
|-
| National government
|
|
|-
| Supranational government
|
|
|-
| International networks 
|
|
|-
| Other initiatives
|
|}
'''13. Which particular interactions among various stakeholders (stakeholder configurations) were crucial in enabling the intervention to emerge successfully? This could include direct or indirect impacts on interventions.'''
answer
'''14. To what extent, in what form and at what stages have citizens participated in the shaping of the intervention?'''
answer
'''15. How are responsibilities and/or decision-making power distributed among actors?'''
answer
'''16. Exclusion:'''
*'''a. Which stakeholders or social groups were excluded (at which stages)?'''
answer
*'''b. Is there any indication why this may have happened? With what outcomes? Has anything been done to overcome such exclusions?'''
answer

Revision as of 17:58, 5 July 2020

a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention

1. What is the name and the urban context (e.g. city/district) of the intervention? Please also indicate the geographical scale of the intervention (e.g. neighborhood, district, small/medium/ capital city, metropolitan area ...). [Example: “Brixton Energy in Brixton, London (neighborhood in capital city)”]

answer incoming

2. What sector(s) (alias domain/ policy field) is the intervention primarily implemented in ? [e.g. housing, mobility, energy, water, health, local economy, biodiversity, CC adaptation, etc.]

answer incoming

3. What is the intervention (i.e. situated experiment) aiming to achieve in terms of sustainability and justice? [If possible, please copy from a project website and give a reference]

answer incoming

4. What is the interventions’ timeframe?

answer incoming

5. By what governance mode is the intervention characterized primarily? (see Appendix 1: Three modes of governance)

answer incoming

6. Why do you consider it worthwhile to study and share experiences made in the context of this governance intervention for sustainable and just cities?[1]

answer incoming

7. In which project deliverable(s) or other documents can information be found on this situated (i.e. place specific) governance intervention?

answer incoming

b) Additional basic characteristics, links to earlier UrbanA work

8. EU Project-context of the intervention:

  • a. Has the intervention been developed or studied in the context of an (EU-funded?) project? (please name the project, its duration and include a link to the project website here).

answer incoming

  • b. According to WP3’s database of approaches, which approach(es) does the intervention best fit under? Where applicable, please indicate if the intervention is found in a project that has been explicitly mentioned in the database.

answer incoming

  • c. Have some project deliverables been coded in the context of UrbanA’s WP4?

answer incoming

9. Problematization and priority:

  • a. How exactly has inequality and exclusion been problematized (by whom) in the context of this intervention?

answer incoming

  • b. Has the achievement of justice explicitly been named as a major motivation behind the intervention?

answer incoming

Drivers of injustices Based on WP4 coding Based on own assessment
1. Exclusive access to the benefits of sustainability infrastructure
2. Material and livelihood inequalities
3. Racialized or ethnically exclusionary urbanization
4. Uneven and exclusionary urban intensification and regeneration
5. Uneven environmental health and pollution patterns
6. Unfit institutional structures
7. Limited citizen participation in urban planning
8. Lack of effective knowledge brokerage and stewardship opportunities
9. Unquestioned Neoliberal growth and austerity urbanism
10. Weak(ened) civil society

c) Actor constellations

10. Who initiated the intervention?

answer

11. Who are the envisioned benefiters of the intervention? (both at a local level and higher, if applicable)

answer

12. Who else is (going to be) involved in the intervention, and what was/is their main role?

Actor types[2] Yes Actor name and role[3]
Academic organizations
Religious organizations
Civil society organizations
Hybrid/ 3rd sector organizations
Platforms
NGOs
Social movements
Political parties
Media
Unions
Social entreprises
For profit entreprises
Local/regional government
Regional organizations
National government
Supranational government
International networks
Other initiatives

13. Which particular interactions among various stakeholders (stakeholder configurations) were crucial in enabling the intervention to emerge successfully? This could include direct or indirect impacts on interventions.

answer

14. To what extent, in what form and at what stages have citizens participated in the shaping of the intervention?

answer

15. How are responsibilities and/or decision-making power distributed among actors?

answer

16. Exclusion:

  • a. Which stakeholders or social groups were excluded (at which stages)?

answer

  • b. Is there any indication why this may have happened? With what outcomes? Has anything been done to overcome such exclusions?

answer

  1. Background to this question: Our four main criteria for selecting particular governance interventions and develop rich descriptions of them were: A) The intervention has been studied in a specific urban context (e.g. city), B) this context is located in Europe (and, preferably, the study was EU-funded), C) the intervention considers to a large extent sustainability AND justice (at least implicitly), and D) it is well-documented, ideally including assumptions or even critical reflections on enablers and barriers to implementation and on transferability (i.e. ‘de-contextualizability’). Additionally, we aimed at a diverse portfolio of domains (see Q2.) and governance modes (see Q5): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nCPcUd-COIQ1MsBjir20_F1CBbnSu6HqKH9nNLshiVQ/edit?usp=sharing.
  2. Actor types according to TRANSIT’s Critical Turning Point Database, http://www.transitsocialinnovation.eu/about-ctps-in-tsi-processes.
  3. If easily possible mention sources for your association of roles.