Difference between revisions of "Governance for urban climate mitigation and adaptation"

From Urban Arena Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:


==Shapes, sizes and applications==
==Shapes, sizes and applications==
Collaborative scenario creation processes - for energy transitions (ENCI-LOWCARB): This approach focuses more on the process on how to achieve a transition to sustainable energy, rather than on the final energy scenarios. The process is divided into several steps which aim at transparently achieving the full inclusion of the civil society in taking climate change measures. This approach is based on the belief that if citizens will become more supportive of an energy transition if they can concretely see their contribution in the final energy scenario.
Governance scheme for energy transition process (MILESECURE): This approach is based on the assumptions that civil society needs to be deeply involved in democratic decision making processes for climate actions to be successfully implemented and for energy transition to occur (read more at point 6).
Smart tool for governance towards floor-resilient cities (FLOODLABEL): This approach consists in informing homeowners on the flood risks they run. It empowers citizens with the knowledge to deal with individual adaptation in their houses.
Early warning service for urban pluvial floods for and by citizens and city authorities (FloodCitiSense): The approach offers an early warning service on urban pluvial flood for citizens and cities authorities to deal with the risks in the most optimal way. Citizens would have direct access to low-cost sensors and web-based technology to be aware of any pluvial flood danger. In this way, citizens are better prepared to respond to risks.


==Relation to UrbanA themes: Cities, sustainability, and justice==
==Relation to UrbanA themes: Cities, sustainability, and justice==

Revision as of 14:16, 16 September 2019

Provide short introduction here

General introduction to approach

Test reference[1] This cluster contains policy approaches developed to tackle climate change mitigation and adaptation. What distinguishes these approaches from any other climate policy is their methodology. They all develop governance tools and processes to involve a diverse groups of stakeholders in climate mitigation and adaptation strategies. This ranges from involving citizens in decision-making processes to empower citizens to deal with adaptation techniques on the ground. The key message of the cluster is that citizens’ involvement and bottom-up approaches are an essential prerequisite to successfully face the challenge of climate change.

Shapes, sizes and applications

Collaborative scenario creation processes - for energy transitions (ENCI-LOWCARB): This approach focuses more on the process on how to achieve a transition to sustainable energy, rather than on the final energy scenarios. The process is divided into several steps which aim at transparently achieving the full inclusion of the civil society in taking climate change measures. This approach is based on the belief that if citizens will become more supportive of an energy transition if they can concretely see their contribution in the final energy scenario.

Governance scheme for energy transition process (MILESECURE): This approach is based on the assumptions that civil society needs to be deeply involved in democratic decision making processes for climate actions to be successfully implemented and for energy transition to occur (read more at point 6).

Smart tool for governance towards floor-resilient cities (FLOODLABEL): This approach consists in informing homeowners on the flood risks they run. It empowers citizens with the knowledge to deal with individual adaptation in their houses.

Early warning service for urban pluvial floods for and by citizens and city authorities (FloodCitiSense): The approach offers an early warning service on urban pluvial flood for citizens and cities authorities to deal with the risks in the most optimal way. Citizens would have direct access to low-cost sensors and web-based technology to be aware of any pluvial flood danger. In this way, citizens are better prepared to respond to risks.

Relation to UrbanA themes: Cities, sustainability, and justice

Narrative of change

Transformative potential

Summary of relevant approaches

References

  1. Test reference