Difference between revisions of "Database of governance scenarios"

From Urban Arena Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(46 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In many places across Europe, people experiment with local governance arrangements that are favourable to justice and sustainability.  
In many places across Europe, people experiment with local governance arrangements that are favourable to justice and sustainability.  
The following, very [[#brief governance scenarios|brief governance scenarios]] represent such attempts. They are here to inspire you and to lead you to further information. In particular, we are just finalizing the [[Database of governance interventions|rich descriptions]] of real world experiments (mostly within EU-funded projects) from which they have been derived. If you know of other informative experiences, please add a brief scenario here or contact us [[User:Philipp Spaeth|Philipp Spaeth]]


== Brief governance scenarios ==
We destilled, the following, very '''brief governance scenarios''' from real world experiements which illustrate such ambitions.
 
They are here to inspire you and to lead you to further information.
 
In particular, if you are interested in how such an intervention was developed in a real urban context, please follow the link at the end of the scenario which will take you to a detailed description of the real world experiment (mostly within EU-funded projects) that the scenario was built upon in our [[Database of governance interventions|rich descriptions]] database.
 
 
 
== Brief governance scenarios, sorted according to their contribution to governance ambitions ==
 
The broad topic of urban governance arrangements for sustainability and justice can be disaggregated into more specific ambitions. Often discussed are the following:
 
[[A) Policy Integration]]
 
[[B) Bridging Institutional Logics]]
 
[[C) Engaging Inhabitants]]
 
[[D) Alternative Metrics]]
 
We have discussed how these ambitions are tentatively realized in promising experiments at a [https://urban-arena.eu/event/urbana-community-conversation-governance-tools/ Community Conversation] on '''June 23rd, 2020'''. Documentation of the event is available on the [https://medium.com/urban-arenas-for-sustainable-and-just-cities/how-governance-arrangements-foster-both-urban-sustainability-and-justice-be7ab3786b46 UrbanA blog].
 
When clicking on one of the ambitions A)-D) above, you will find a list of the short scenarios that are best illustrating these ambitions.
 
Each of these ambitions is meant to adress one or several of the drivers of injustice, see on the respective pages A) - D) above with links to our [[Database of drivers of injustice]].
 
Which further ambitions do you consider crucial on the way towards governance for sustainability AND justice in cities?
And what other examples do you know where these ambitions have been guiding the setting up of arrangements for justice oriented sustainability governance?
 
Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. via email to [[User:Philipp Spaeth|Philipp Spaeth]].
Please also contribue to the development of further case studies and governance scenarios on this wiki and join the [[UrbanA Community of Practice]].
 
== Brief governance scenarios, sorted according to governance modes ==
 
Some governance arrangements for sustainability and justice in cities are initiated by local governments, while others are initiated by social movements or even enterprises. We present here some governance scenarios that are driven primarily by governmental actors, civil society or hybrid arrangements: 
 
[[A) Government led]]
 
[[B) Civil society driven]]
 
[[C) Hybrid arrangements]]
 
When clicking on one of the modes A) - C) above, you will find a list of the short scenarios that are best illustrating these governance modes.
 
And what other examples do you know where these ambitions have been guiding the setting up of arrangements for justice oriented sustainability governance?
 
Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. via email to  [[User:Philipp Spaeth|Philipp Spaeth]].
 
== Brief governance scenarios, sorted according to sectors ==
 
Governance arrangements for sustainability and justice in cities differ from sector to sector due to the specific nature of services provided in these sectors. We describe in detail some governance arrangements that have been developed in the following sectors:
 
[[A) Mobility]]
[[B) Housing]]
[[C) Food]]
 
[[D) Energy]]
 
[[E) Urban development/regeneration]]
 
[[F) Biodiversity protection]]
 
Do you want to complement this list and add other sectors that address justice and sustainability in urban governance?
 
Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. via email to  [[User:Philipp Spaeth|Philipp Spaeth]].
 
== Full list of brief governance scenarios ==
 
If you know of other informative experiences, please contact us, e.g. via email to [[User:Philipp Spaeth|Philipp Spaeth]]


# [[Learning from successful community-based actions against gentrification]]
# [[Learning from successful community-based actions against gentrification]]
Line 15: Line 84:
# [[Making local energy systems inclusively sustainable - by ourselves, with a little help by friends]]
# [[Making local energy systems inclusively sustainable - by ourselves, with a little help by friends]]
# [[Trusting civil society and residents to co-shape regeneration projects in deprived neighborhoods]]
# [[Trusting civil society and residents to co-shape regeneration projects in deprived neighborhoods]]
== Governance ambitions ==
The broad topic of local governance arrangements for sustainability and justice can be disaggregated into more specific ambitions. Often discussed are, e.g.:
;A) How can sustainability and justice challenges be dealt with in a more integrative and comprehensive way - rather than by (sectoraly) compartmentalized policies and organizations?
:(“policy integration”)
;B) How can people from governments, civil society and enterprises be enabled to better co-operate for sustainability and justice in their cities?
:(“bridging institutional logics”)
;C) How can inhabitants be better enabled to participate in deliberations about the most urgent objectives and measures of urban development?
:(“inhabitants' involvement”)
;D) Do we need alternative metrics to guide urban policy development, which could focus on well-beeing and the affordability of housing rather than on GDP growth, employment and investments?
:(“alternative metrics”)
We have discussed how these ambitions are tentatively realized in promising experiments at a [https://urban-arena.eu/event/urbana-community-conversation-governance-tools/ Community Conversation] on '''June 23rd, 2020'''; Documentation of the event will be available soon. 
Which further ambitions do you consider crucial on the way towards governance for sustainability AND justice in cities?
Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. [[User:Philipp Spaeth|Philipp Spaeth]], and contribue to the development of further case studies and governance scenarios on this wiki and join the [[UrbanA Community of Practice]].

Latest revision as of 15:56, 9 July 2020

In many places across Europe, people experiment with local governance arrangements that are favourable to justice and sustainability.

We destilled, the following, very brief governance scenarios from real world experiements which illustrate such ambitions.

They are here to inspire you and to lead you to further information.

In particular, if you are interested in how such an intervention was developed in a real urban context, please follow the link at the end of the scenario which will take you to a detailed description of the real world experiment (mostly within EU-funded projects) that the scenario was built upon in our rich descriptions database.


Brief governance scenarios, sorted according to their contribution to governance ambitions

The broad topic of urban governance arrangements for sustainability and justice can be disaggregated into more specific ambitions. Often discussed are the following:

A) Policy Integration

B) Bridging Institutional Logics

C) Engaging Inhabitants

D) Alternative Metrics

We have discussed how these ambitions are tentatively realized in promising experiments at a Community Conversation on June 23rd, 2020. Documentation of the event is available on the UrbanA blog.

When clicking on one of the ambitions A)-D) above, you will find a list of the short scenarios that are best illustrating these ambitions.

Each of these ambitions is meant to adress one or several of the drivers of injustice, see on the respective pages A) - D) above with links to our Database of drivers of injustice.

Which further ambitions do you consider crucial on the way towards governance for sustainability AND justice in cities? And what other examples do you know where these ambitions have been guiding the setting up of arrangements for justice oriented sustainability governance?

Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. via email to Philipp Spaeth. Please also contribue to the development of further case studies and governance scenarios on this wiki and join the UrbanA Community of Practice.

Brief governance scenarios, sorted according to governance modes

Some governance arrangements for sustainability and justice in cities are initiated by local governments, while others are initiated by social movements or even enterprises. We present here some governance scenarios that are driven primarily by governmental actors, civil society or hybrid arrangements:

A) Government led

B) Civil society driven

C) Hybrid arrangements

When clicking on one of the modes A) - C) above, you will find a list of the short scenarios that are best illustrating these governance modes.

And what other examples do you know where these ambitions have been guiding the setting up of arrangements for justice oriented sustainability governance?

Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. via email to Philipp Spaeth.

Brief governance scenarios, sorted according to sectors

Governance arrangements for sustainability and justice in cities differ from sector to sector due to the specific nature of services provided in these sectors. We describe in detail some governance arrangements that have been developed in the following sectors:

A) Mobility

B) Housing

C) Food

D) Energy

E) Urban development/regeneration

F) Biodiversity protection

Do you want to complement this list and add other sectors that address justice and sustainability in urban governance?

Please share your suggestions with us, e.g. via email to Philipp Spaeth.

Full list of brief governance scenarios

If you know of other informative experiences, please contact us, e.g. via email to Philipp Spaeth

  1. Learning from successful community-based actions against gentrification
  2. Expanding effective practices for food rescuing and sharing among cities
  3. A new take on affordable housing through community owned and developed dwellings
  4. Inviting citizens to a transformation of street space - flexibly dealing with resistance
  5. Balancing long term sustainability and short-term social needs in peri-urban green space
  6. Envisioning and co-creating sustainable urban neighborhoods by reaching across institutional boundaries
  7. Bringing sustainable infrastructure to all - carefully engaging in public-private partnerships
  8. From electricity to empowerment, community energy growing out of the inner-city
  9. Overcoming compartmentalization in urban regeneration projects for inclusive sustainability and resilience
  10. Making local energy systems inclusively sustainable - by ourselves, with a little help by friends
  11. Trusting civil society and residents to co-shape regeneration projects in deprived neighborhoods