Difference between revisions of "Inner-city community energy in London"

From Urban Arena Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 36: Line 36:
*'''a. Has the intervention been developed or studied in the context of an (EU-funded?) project? (please name the project, its duration and include a link to the project website here).'''
*'''a. Has the intervention been developed or studied in the context of an (EU-funded?) project? (please name the project, its duration and include a link to the project website here).'''


answer
answer incoming


*'''b. According to WP3’s database of approaches, which approach(es) does the intervention best fit under? Where applicable, please indicate if the intervention is found in a project that has been explicitly mentioned in the database.'''
*'''b. According to WP3’s database of approaches, which approach(es) does the intervention best fit under? Where applicable, please indicate if the intervention is found in a project that has been explicitly mentioned in the database.'''


answer
answer incoming


*'''c. Have some project deliverables been coded in the context of UrbanA’s WP4?'''
*'''c. Have some project deliverables been coded in the context of UrbanA’s WP4?'''


answer
answer incoming


'''9. Problematization and priority:'''
'''9. Problematization and priority:'''
Line 50: Line 50:
*'''a. How exactly has inequality and exclusion been problematized (by whom) in the context of this intervention?'''
*'''a. How exactly has inequality and exclusion been problematized (by whom) in the context of this intervention?'''


answer
answer incoming


*'''b. Has the achievement of justice explicitly been named as a major motivation behind the intervention?'''
*'''b. Has the achievement of justice explicitly been named as a major motivation behind the intervention?'''


answer
answer incoming


*'''c. Which drivers of injustice does the intervention address? (see [[Database of drivers of injustice | Database of drivers of injustice]])'''
*'''c. Which drivers of injustice does the intervention address? (see [[Database of drivers of injustice | Database of drivers of injustice]])'''

Revision as of 16:57, 5 July 2020

a) Basic characteristics and ambitions of the intervention

1. What is the name and the urban context (e.g. city/district) of the intervention? Please also indicate the geographical scale of the intervention (e.g. neighborhood, district, small/medium/ capital city, metropolitan area ...). [Example: “Brixton Energy in Brixton, London (neighborhood in capital city)”]

answer incoming

2. What sector(s) (alias domain/ policy field) is the intervention primarily implemented in ? [e.g. housing, mobility, energy, water, health, local economy, biodiversity, CC adaptation, etc.]

answer incoming

3. What is the intervention (i.e. situated experiment) aiming to achieve in terms of sustainability and justice? [If possible, please copy from a project website and give a reference]

answer incoming

4. What is the interventions’ timeframe?

answer incoming

5. By what governance mode is the intervention characterized primarily? (see Appendix 1: Three modes of governance)

answer incoming

6. Why do you consider it worthwhile to study and share experiences made in the context of this governance intervention for sustainable and just cities?[1]

answer incoming

7. In which project deliverable(s) or other documents can information be found on this situated (i.e. place specific) governance intervention?

answer incoming

b) Additional basic characteristics, links to earlier UrbanA work

8. EU Project-context of the intervention:

  • a. Has the intervention been developed or studied in the context of an (EU-funded?) project? (please name the project, its duration and include a link to the project website here).

answer incoming

  • b. According to WP3’s database of approaches, which approach(es) does the intervention best fit under? Where applicable, please indicate if the intervention is found in a project that has been explicitly mentioned in the database.

answer incoming

  • c. Have some project deliverables been coded in the context of UrbanA’s WP4?

answer incoming

9. Problematization and priority:

  • a. How exactly has inequality and exclusion been problematized (by whom) in the context of this intervention?

answer incoming

  • b. Has the achievement of justice explicitly been named as a major motivation behind the intervention?

answer incoming

Drivers of injustices Based on WP4 coding Based on own assessment
1. Exclusive access to the benefits of sustainability infrastructure
2. Material and livelihood inequalities
3. Racialized or ethnically exclusionary urbanization
4. Uneven and exclusionary urban intensification and regeneration
5. Uneven environmental health and pollution patterns
6. Unfit institutional structures
7. Limited citizen participation in urban planning
8. Lack of effective knowledge brokerage and stewardship opportunities
9. Unquestioned Neoliberal growth and austerity urbanism
10. Weak(ened) civil society
  1. Background to this question: Our four main criteria for selecting particular governance interventions and develop rich descriptions of them were: A) The intervention has been studied in a specific urban context (e.g. city), B) this context is located in Europe (and, preferably, the study was EU-funded), C) the intervention considers to a large extent sustainability AND justice (at least implicitly), and D) it is well-documented, ideally including assumptions or even critical reflections on enablers and barriers to implementation and on transferability (i.e. ‘de-contextualizability’). Additionally, we aimed at a diverse portfolio of domains (see Q2.) and governance modes (see Q5): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nCPcUd-COIQ1MsBjir20_F1CBbnSu6HqKH9nNLshiVQ/edit?usp=sharing.